Ring ring
Home
Almost two years before this, in 1808, Supreme Court Lawyer on returning to Chandigarh right after visiting his estates experienced involuntarily found himself in a leading place among the Chandigarh Supreme Court Lawyers .

Seasoned Advocates in Supreme Court of India - SimranLaw 9876616815 - Everything about Advocate

and she examined Laxmibai. The only piece of evidence which he has given and which is useful for our enquiry is that in the phone book (Ex. Miss Aneeja was then a raw Medical Graduate, having passed the M. In the High Court as also before us an attempt was made on behalf of the respondents to establish that the taluqdar retained a reversionary right to " Lalliti " lands in case the holder died without any heir. The first examination, according to her, was at 6-30 a.

We are not suggesting that this is what has happened in this case; but when we have to deal with a case of crime versus natural death, we cannot overlook the possibility of some ingenious artifice having been used to screen the action. Miss Aneeja also claims to have phoned to Dr. Variava visited the Ward at 11 a. Divatia, the Chairman of the Board, had wide and considerable experience as Chairman of the Textile Labour Enquiry Committee, Bombay, had been the President of the First Industrial Court to be set up in India in 1938, and had worked as an Industrial Tribunal dealing with several disputes as between several banks and employees, as well as between several insurance companies and their employees.

The commitment is, therefore, bad in law and must be quashed on this ground alone. Patel is thus useless, except in this little respect. She was working as the House Physician, 481 and was in charge of Ward No. A poison of which one of the symptoms would be the contracting of the pupils of the eyes may be side-tracked by putting into the eyes of the victim a drug like atropine, which by its local 516 action dilates the pupils. Variava on the morning of the 13th was shown.

72) was the Registrar of Unit No. He has no contribution to make, because he says he does not remember anything. We give this example, because most of us know the action of atropine on the eyes, and because the example also shows how easily a person with knowledge may confuse the symptoms by a simple trick. Miss Aneeja stated that the urine was examined by her three times, and in the first sample, sugar and acetone were present in quantities.

The High Court then considered the meaning of the expression ' taluqdari estate' and said that it was used in a descriptive sense and was not equivalent to the expression 'Taluqdar'sestate'. She was summoned from her quarters to the Ward at 6-15 a. We do not at this stage refer to the instructions for postmortem examination left by Dr. The patient was then made over to the care of Dr. Variava examined Laxmibai.

The company sent a written representation to the Government denying the allegations. We are, therefore, of opinion that the breach of s. 208 which took place in this case was such as was bound to cause a failure of justice and there is, therefore, no question of the application of s. If the accused did not want to do so, the Magistrate would have done his duty and his way would be clear to proceed further with his intention to commit the accused.

If this is the reply expected, it makes it all the more incumbent on the Magistrate to inform the accused that he was intending to commit the case and ask him if he wished to produce evidence. 323) in which all calls are entered, no call to Dr. Saify, the Registrar of the Unit, visited the Ward at 8- 30 a. She stated that she 482 had used Benedict test for sugar and Rothera's test for acetone. , and examined Laxmibai, but the patient expired at 11-30 a.

(b) declaration that there was in fact and in law no contract between the parties on account of mutual mistake of the parties; and (c) that the court might be pleased to adjudicate on the existence and/or validity of the alleged arbitration agreement and the effect of the same. 10, 12 and 14 Of the Bihar Mica Act, 1947, and calling upon it to show cause why action should not be taken to cancel its licence which was being issued from year to year for mining Mica.

The High Court said rightly in our opinion, that on the materials placed before it, it could not be said that the respondents had established that position. , and consulted him about the case. 537 in these circumstances. In all the examinations, according to her, there was no albumin present. But when the Magistrate did not intimate to the appellants in this case that he was intending to commit them for trial and proceeded to frame charges and pass the order of commitment forthwith on September 30, he was denying to them their right to produce defence under s.

of glucose should be administered. The denial of that right is in our opinion in itself sufficient to cause prejudice to the accused and failure of justice inasmuch as the accused were prevented from leading evidence which might have induced the Magistrate not to frame a charge against them or cancel it. Variava, the Honorary Physician, at 6-45 or 7 a. The Secretary of the Government of Bihar in the Revenue Department issued a notice to the petitioner company who were the lessees of mining lease, charging it with violation of ss.

and wrote on the case papers that an intravenous injection of 40 units of insulin with 20 C. The company asked for particulars of the alleged violation of the provisions of the Act from the Government which was furnished. 748 is of no consequence, so far as this conclusion is concerned.
Back to posts
This post has no comments - be the first one!

UNDER MAINTENANCE