It needs to be emphasized that prior to 1984, the exemption to paper made from unconventional raw materials was available only when the paper is manufactured from the specified non-conventional raw materials. 1 was not capable of waiver by the defendants. Failure to comply with conditions: No failure by the Insured to comply with the terms and conditions of the Policy shall be deemed to have been waived, excused or accepted by the Corporation unless the same is expressly so waived, excused or accepted by the Corporation in writing and such waiver, excuse or acceptable shall be subject to such terms and conditions as the Corporation may stipulate, including a reduction in the percentage specified under clause 30 of this policy being the percentage of loss payable by the Corporation.

2 of the right, conferred separately on both the buyer and the seller, to terminate the contract in the event that, despite having used all reasonable endeavours, the seller has not secured performance of the documents service term by 1 February 2010? Their applications are allowed. Rag pulps are used in papers where permanence and durability are needed, for example, ledger, blueprint, map, currency papers etc. In respect of the State of Punjab, the Committee considered thirty- seven cases referred to it.

He further states that he had seen the accused giving knife blows to the prosecutrix as a result of which the thigh of the prosecutrix started bleeding. Rag Pulps: Papermaking fibres of cotton made from materials like new or old cotton textile cuttings or cotton linters, mill run, fly cotton, cotton waste etc. It found that seven allotments were on merit and twenty-nine allotments were not in consonance with the guidelines. Out of them, twenty-six have filed applications. We have been taken through the reasoning recorded by the Committee.

Thus, jute stalks was specified as a non-conventional raw material in the notification itself. So far as cases of Shri Surinder Singh, Chander Kant Bhatia, Gurpreet Singh, Smt Kavita Rani, Smt Suman Lata, Ms Ruby Sekhri, Mr Manmohan Singh, Mr Rajesh Madan and Mr Tejinder Singh are concerned, they appear to be borderline cases. Such property will therefore be transferable without the constraints mentioned in sub-section (1) of Section 27 of the ULC Act. There are six applications by non-allottees.

He further states that while leaving the two sisters on the road, he went to call the father of the prosecutrix (PW4) and when he came back along with PW4, he found them sitting where he had left them What then of the presence in clause 25. Union of India and Ors. For example, Notification No. It was the presence of this right that persuaded Judge Madge to conclude that clause 25. He says on his coming to the place, the accused fled away. However, he also states that private parts of the prosecutrix were also bleeding.

46/83-CE dated 01-03-1983 prescribed concessional rate of excise duty for paper containing not less than fifty per cent by weight of pulp made from bagasse, jute stalks, cereal straw, elephant grass (Imperata Cylindrica), mesta (Kneaf) or waste paper. This plea was not even raised by the respondents herein in their written statement. As far as permission under the ULC Act is concerned, learned senior counsel relied upon a decision of this Supreme Court of India Lawyer - visit the next site - in The Maharao Sahib Shri Bhim Singhji vs.

PW2 Manohar Lal (uncle of the prosecutrix) has also stated in his deposition that he saw the accused sitting over the prosecutrix and having his private part inserted in the private parts of the prosecutrix. (1981) 1 SCC 166 and submitted that sub-Section (1) of Section 27 of the Act is invalid insofar as it imposes a restriction on transfer of any urban or urbanisable land with a building or a portion only of such building, which is within the ceiling area.

However, the Parliament may exercise its legislative powers with respect to extra-territorial aspects or causes, - events, things, phenomena (howsoever commonplace they may be), resources, actions or transactions, and the like -- that occur, arise or exist or may be expected to do so, naturally or on account of some human agency, in the social, political, economic, cultural, biological, environmental or physical spheres outside the territory of India, and seek to control, modulate, mitigate or transform the effects of such extra-territorial aspects or causes, or in appropriate cases, eliminate or engender such extra-territorial aspects or causes, only when such extra-territorial aspects or causes have, or are expected to have, some impact on, or effect in, or consequences for: (a) the territory of India, or any part of India n(a) the territory of India, or any part of India; or (b) the interests of, welfare of, wellbeing of, or security of inhabitants of India, and Indians?

They are also rejected as we are not concerned with non- allottees. In our view, it may not be appropriate to cancel the allotment in favour of these nine persons. The answer to the above would be yes. Rest of the cases do not call for interference and the applications are rejected.