Therefore, the reference to those provisions contained in other enactments in our considered opinion does not cause any impediment for SEBI to proceed against the respondents in exercise of its jurisdiction under the SEBI Act, 1992 nTo support the contention that the SEBI Act, 1992 operates only within Indian territory, reference was made to the provisions contained in other Acts viz. It was admitted that the said amounts belonged to the family though the investments had been made in the names of the different members of the family.

Appellant 2 who was a major filed a separate written 214 statement generally adopting the written statement filed by appellant 1 ; nevertheless he put the respondent to the strict proof of the allegations made by him in the plaint in support of his claim. If we say it is a book, but we mean it is a horse, table or an elephant, then we will not be able to communicate with each other. Qureshi may not have come to know of the mental disorder of the prosecutrix However, there is no dispute that the prosecutrix was far from normal as she was suffering from some mental disorder.

Broadly stated these were the pleas raised by appellants 1 and 3 to 5. It was, however, urged that the total value of the assets enumerated in Sch. That being so, the powers of the Appellate Authorities in the matter of settle- ment, would be co-extensive with the powers of the primary authority, namely, the District Collector or the Sub- Divisional Officer. , IPC, FERA, FEMA, Companies Act, the Information Technology Act and the Income Tax Act. Keshwar Lal Chaudhuri and others (1), and of this Court in Ebrahim Aboobakar and another v.

Paragraph 129 referred to above states in terms that 1314 only four categories of posts mentioned therein fall within the cadre of Assistant Station Directors, and those categories do not include Public Relations Officers. Therefore, we are unable to see any violation of exercise of its jurisdiction since the underlying shares of GDR were created and dealt with as well as traded in the stock market of Indian Territory. Even when she was examined in Court, she was found to be of unsound mind.

There is no indication that they make any distinction between the grounds of interference on appeal and in revision. In regard to the jewels and moveables it was contended that several items not belonging to the family, and some not even 'in existence, bad been shown in the said schedule. It was also alleged that some of the jewels shown in the said schedule belonged to the several appellants as their separate property. If we say that a certain object is a book, then we mean it is a book.

The respondent's case that appellant I had manipulated accounts and misappropriated family funds was denied, and it was urged that for the purpose of partition the assets of the family as they stood on the date of the partition should be taken into account. The Guardian Court is directed to recall the dismissal order passed by it and thereafter consider the Appellants application for guardianship expeditiously without requiring notice to be given to the putative father of the child The Appeal is therefore allowed.

Life will become impossible. It would be highly unlikely and assumptuous on our part to say that even after conducting the whole examination of the prosecutrix, Dr. Then as regards the Thanathu maral accounts the appellants gave a detailed history of the amounts and their investments. Hence, the meaning of the literal rule of interpretation is simply that we mean what we say and we say what we mean.

See in this connection, the observations of the Federal Court in Lachmeshwar Prasad Shukul and others v. 15,00,000 as alleged by the respondent. The written statement referred to some more properties which had not been included in the plaint though they were liable to partition. According to them there was a special practice obtaining among the families of the Nattukottai Chettiar community according to which appellant I was entitled to a decent remuneration for the management of the joint family business and properties.

In the first place, the said reliance placed on the provisions of those enactments providing for extra territorial jurisdiction can have no impact on the action initiated by the appellant, for the simple reason that the violation complained of by the appellant is with reference to such of those provisions contained in SEBI Act, 1992 vis- à-vis the underlying shares of GDRs. The appellants also pleaded that the Lawyer Supreme Court India (made my day) had no jurisdiction to divide the immoveable properties situated in Burma.

Any act which caused any infringement in such trading of those underlying shares by virtue of any malfeasance or misfeasance or misdeeds committed by any person under the Act which worked against the interests of the investors in securities and the securities market, the SEBI was entitled to proceed against such persons who are involved in any of those allegations. She has said in her statement that the girl she had examined was a healthy and 'normal' one. 'C ' would be only Rs.

According to another custom pleaded by the appellants it was alleged that provision had to be made for future Seermurais for the unmarried daughters of the family. Neither the Act nor the rules made thereunder, indicate the grounds on which the first Appellate Authority, namely, the Excise Commissioner, or the second Appellate Authority (the Excise Appellate Authority), has to exercise his or its appellate or revisional powers.